“ Is the Department of Defense operating under the premise that there is a third “nonbinary” sex among human beings?” : 'I'm Pretty Much Leading a Double Life:' Nonbinary Troops and the Pentagon's Next FrontierĬMR put a key question to both the Defense Department and the Institute of Defense Analysis, but both declined to answer:.Some of these questions were answered in a second article by : At a minimum, these include the ethics of medical treatments and surgeries that change appearance but not biological sex, plus concerns about personal privacy, women’s athletics, religious liberty, and other matters of concern. In addition, CMR asked about the agendas of groups named in the article and points of controversy. Among other things, we asked the DoD to verify or refute anything included in the article and inquired about the contractor (IDA) reported to be managing the project, costs of the contract, and the due date for deliverables. When a spokesman for the IDA declined to answer CMR’s inquiries about the project, we submitted comparable questions to DoD Public Affairs. Palm Center, SPARTA, a transgender military organization, and the Modern Military Association of America (MMAA). : Pentagon Quietly Looking into How Nonbinary Troops Could Serve OpenlyĪccording to the article, the Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA) is working with the Defense Department and consulting with at least three LGBT activist groups to craft mandates for military persons who identify as transgender or are “nonbinary.” Organizations mentioned include the Michael D.recently reported that the Department of Defense (DoD) is seeking advice on how to accommodate “nonbinary” troops in the military. Biden Defense Department Looking for Ways to Deny Biological Realities Extremism of any kind has no place in the military, but policy makers must apply anti-extremism rules at both ends of the political spectrum, not just one.ī. Senator Inhofe also criticized the Pentagon for being “more focused on promoting its leftist social agenda in the military instead of countering China, Russia, and Iran or creating an effective counterterrorism plan.”ĬMR will closely monitor what comes of this ill-advised Extremism Report and activities resulting from it. Republican Senators supporting Inhofe’s inquiry included Roger Wicker (MS), Deb Fischer (NB), Tom Cotton (AR), Mike Rounds (SD), Joni Ernst (IA), Thom Tillis (NC), Dan Sullivan (AK), Kevin Cramer (ND), Rick Scott (FL), Marsha Blackburn (TN), and Tommy Tuberville (AL). Inhofe countered by noting that the Pentagon documented fewer than one hundred cases of extremism in today’s forces, which works out to 58,000 hours of training for each instance. Milley tried to minimize the expense in terms of time and money: “This averages to just over 2 hours per service member in a total force of 2.46 million members and is comparable to other Joint Force periodic training requirements.” With the politicized, woke culture taking hold in the Pentagon, interpretations of Secretary Austin’s policies, which will apply to social media communications including emojis, could ruin the careers of personnel who express conservative views.Īccording to a recent Roll Call report, General Mark Milley responded to an inquiry from Senate Armed Services Committee Ranking Member James Inhofe with a letter indicating that training sessions focused on these issues since January 2021 cost the armed forces nearly 6 million hours and about $1 million in additional expenses. Elaine Donnelly, The Federalist: Pentagon Efforts to Root Out ‘Extremism’ Almost Entirely Ignore The Left.In this article, CMR explained how new regulations could apply to situations that otherwise would be protected by the First Amendment: Out of more than two million military members, the Pentagon’s new report admitted that incidents are “rare. Secretary Austin’s obsession with radicalism in the ranks has not been proportionate or even-handed. In December 2021, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin released a “Report on Countering Extremist Activity Within the Department of Defense” – an outgrowth of the worldwide standdown to examine extremism in the ranks, which Austin ordered shortly after the Inauguration. CMR Challenges Defense Department “Anti-Extremist” Report The DoD’s recently released report on Extremism in the Armed Forces, for example, is skewed by leftist political forces who label any expression of dissent as “extremism.”Ī. This edition of CMR E-Notes calls out several examples of “woke-ism” in the Department of Defense.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |